[Talk-transit] commuter rail

Janko Mihelić janjko at gmail.com
Tue Oct 4 15:40:59 BST 2011


Also there is the tag network=local and regional. I would guess "local"
could be a commuter train by default, don't you think so? If not, I suggest
a second tag, something like route=train, route:type=commute.

The difference for me is just too small and ambiguous to invent a new
route..

Janko

2011/10/4 <danmey at web.de>

> **
> Am 04.10.2011 14:34, schrieb Arun Ganesh:
>
> In *any* case of tagging there are cases difficult to define well. There
> might be these services that you point out, not a lot as you say. So should
> we stop improving the tagging system because of these ambiguous cases?
> Personally, for a train service like you say I would put route=train on the
> relation.
> But there are a lot of service that are very easy to define as commuter
> rail.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20111004/bcdd2564/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-transit mailing list