[Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

Janko Mihelić janjko at gmail.com
Tue Aug 12 10:08:52 UTC 2014


It only takes one great public transport map with routing, and the new
scheme will come to life. Who cares about Openstreetmap default map. Who
cares about the public transport layer on Openstreetmap which doesn't even
have tram lines rendered. We need outside help with this :)

Janko


2014-08-12 0:55 GMT+02:00 Jo <winfixit at gmail.com>:

> Now that the new way of rendering with Carto instead of Mapnik is finally
> becoming reality, it becomes clear that highway=bus_stop will never (or at
> least not during my lifetime) be replaced by
> public_transport=platform/bus=yes.
>
> I started to double tag all the new stops I'm adding and the ones I'm
> updating.
>
> Some people claim that public_transport=platform/bus=yes is longer and
> less efficient than highway=bus_stop, but of course
>
> highway=bus_stop
> public_transport=platform
> bus=yes
>
> is even less so, but I stopped caring about that.
>
> Pity,
>
> Polyglot
>
>
> 2013-12-11 21:41 GMT+01:00 Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com
> >:
>
> tag-transform is an osmosis plugin. It happens before conversion to the
>> postgres database, so you can use any tags that exist in the wild
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Jo <winfixit at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For a long time, public_transport was not transfered to the DB used for
>>> the rendering of Mapnik. At that time it didn't make sense to update
>>> stylesheets.
>>>
>>> Jo
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/12/11 Mike N <niceman at att.net>
>>>
>>>> On 12/11/2013 11:07 AM, fly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you keep on adding both schemes simultaneously you will not notice
>>>>> the problem and there will be no reason for developers to adjust the
>>>>> software.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  One of the problems in this situation is the map rendering developers
>>>> have not taken an interest in the new scheme.
>>>>
>>>>   If someone has submitted a 'pull request' that included the new
>>>> tagging scheme but it was ignored, that is a different story.  OSM is
>>>> frequently described as a do-ocracy - in which finished and coded solutions
>>>> win out over what is needed.  And it's quite possible that we public
>>>> transport mappers have been collecting and entering the information but
>>>> have never gotten into CSS Map stylesheets, or whatever is the technology
>>>> behind the renderers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-transit mailing list
>>>> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-transit mailing list
>>> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20140812/1051d903/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-transit mailing list