[Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

seirra prototypex99 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 19 09:32:18 UTC 2019


(replied to using a backup because my other email is currently down) I 
find the automatic sort button in the relations editor is a great tool 
for mapping routes

On 3/19/19 1:55 AM, David Suárez wrote:
>
> Oh, I couldn't find the problem, but I will keep working on improving 
> other routes. I hope to become more skillful in a couple of months.
>
> Thanks again,
> David
>
> El 18/03/19 a las 19:10, Jo escribió:
>> I removed two ways from the relation. One where there are 2 parallel 
>> ones, but only one of those can serve that stop. The other was a part 
>> that I deleted as well. It was probably the result from a split that 
>> went bad.
>>
>> Jo
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 AM David Suárez <serpuma at apuntia.com 
>> <mailto:serpuma at apuntia.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't mind, I
>>     would ask you what was the problem? I could swear there was no
>>     segment missing.
>>
>>     Gracias,
>>     David
>>
>>     El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió:
>>>     Hola David,
>>>
>>>     Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?
>>>
>>>     Jo
>>>
>>>     On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez
>>>     <serpuma at apuntia.com <mailto:serpuma at apuntia.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Hello,
>>>
>>>         I am trying to improve public transport route in my city
>>>         following the
>>>         PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning regarding
>>>         the existence
>>>         of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot find
>>>         any issue,
>>>         except for a couple of segments which appear in the wrong
>>>         direction when
>>>         using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both
>>>         segments are
>>>         ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as
>>>         two-way paths.
>>>         Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is related to
>>>         the route
>>>         being a round trip or what I am missing.
>>>
>>>         This is the route:
>>>         https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
>>>         the problematic segments seem to be:
>>>         https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
>>>         https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480
>>>
>>>
>>>         Thank you for your help,
>>>         David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Talk-transit mailing list
>>>         Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>>>         <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Talk-transit mailing list
>>>     Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org  <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Talk-transit mailing list
>>     Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>>     <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-transit mailing list
>> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20190319/75f05b49/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-transit mailing list