[Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

[Jo]

This summer it will see an additional improvement for routes with
loops/spoons if the GSoC project gets accepted.

Jo

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:10 AM seirra <prototypex99 at gmail.com> wrote:

> (replied to using a backup because my other email is currently down) I
> find the automatic sort button in the relations editor is a great tool for
> mapping routes
> On 3/19/19 1:55 AM, David Suárez wrote:
>
> Oh, I couldn't find the problem, but I will keep working on improving
> other routes. I hope to become more skillful in a couple of months.
>
> Thanks again,
> David
> El 18/03/19 a las 19:10, Jo escribió:
>
> I removed two ways from the relation. One where there are 2 parallel ones,
> but only one of those can serve that stop. The other was a part that I
> deleted as well. It was probably the result from a split that went bad.
>
> Jo
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 AM David Suárez <serpuma at apuntia.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't mind, I would
>> ask you what was the problem? I could swear there was no segment missing.
>>
>> Gracias,
>> David
>> El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió:
>>
>> Hola David,
>>
>> Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?
>>
>> Jo
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez <serpuma at apuntia.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to improve public transport route in my city following the
>>> PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning regarding the existence
>>> of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot find any issue,
>>> except for a couple of segments which appear in the wrong direction when
>>> using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both segments are
>>> ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as two-way paths.
>>> Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is related to the route
>>> being a round trip or what I am missing.
>>>
>>> This is the route: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
>>> the problematic segments seem to be:
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your help,
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-transit mailing list
>>> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-transit mailing listTalk-transit at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-transit mailing list
>> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing listTalk-transit at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing listTalk-transit at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20190322/907cb996/attachment-0001.html>