[Talk-transit] Help with bus route consisting of a round trip

[David Suárez]

This would be great. Indeed, I find the sort button very useful, but
sometimes, even when stops and segments are in the relation, the sort
button makes its job, but it reverses the order of the segments, so I
have needed to manually fix the route. However, I am still not sure if
it was my fault, because I forgot to set something before using the
button, or if it is doing its job right and the wrong result was due to
a problem with the elements in the relation. :'-(

David

El 22/03/19 a las 0:32, Jo escribió:
> This summer it will see an additional improvement for routes with
> loops/spoons if the GSoC project gets accepted.
>
> Jo
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 12:10 AM seirra <prototypex99 at gmail.com
> <mailto:prototypex99 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     (replied to using a backup because my other email is currently
>     down) I find the automatic sort button in the relations editor is
>     a great tool for mapping routes
>
>     On 3/19/19 1:55 AM, David Suárez wrote:
>>
>>     Oh, I couldn't find the problem, but I will keep working on
>>     improving other routes. I hope to become more skillful in a
>>     couple of months.
>>
>>     Thanks again,
>>     David
>>
>>     El 18/03/19 a las 19:10, Jo escribió:
>>>     I removed two ways from the relation. One where there are 2
>>>     parallel ones, but only one of those can serve that stop. The
>>>     other was a part that I deleted as well. It was probably the
>>>     result from a split that went bad.
>>>
>>>     Jo
>>>
>>>     On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:05 AM David Suárez
>>>     <serpuma at apuntia.com <mailto:serpuma at apuntia.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Yes, I'm using it, but I am just beginning. If you don't
>>>         mind, I would ask you what was the problem? I could swear
>>>         there was no segment missing.
>>>
>>>         Gracias,
>>>         David
>>>
>>>         El 18/03/19 a las 17:22, Jo escribió:
>>>>         Hola David,
>>>>
>>>>         Now it's continuous. Do you know about the PT_Assistant plugin?
>>>>
>>>>         Jo
>>>>
>>>>         On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:57 PM David Suárez
>>>>         <serpuma at apuntia.com <mailto:serpuma at apuntia.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             Hello,
>>>>
>>>>             I am trying to improve public transport route in my
>>>>             city following the
>>>>             PTv2 scheme. However, I get a validation warning
>>>>             regarding the existence
>>>>             of a gap. I checked all the way segments but I cannot
>>>>             find any issue,
>>>>             except for a couple of segments which appear in the
>>>>             wrong direction when
>>>>             using the relation editor in JOSM. Nonetheless, both
>>>>             segments are
>>>>             ordered correctly in the route and they are marked as
>>>>             two-way paths.
>>>>             Hence, I don't know if the validation problem is
>>>>             related to the route
>>>>             being a round trip or what I am missing.
>>>>
>>>>             This is the route:
>>>>             https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9402608 and
>>>>             the problematic segments seem to be:
>>>>             https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499715621 and
>>>>             https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96613480
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Thank you for your help,
>>>>             David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>             Talk-transit mailing list
>>>>             Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>>>>             <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>             https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         Talk-transit mailing list
>>>>         Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>>>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Talk-transit mailing list
>>>         Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>>>         <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Talk-transit mailing list
>>>     Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Talk-transit mailing list
>>     Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>     _______________________________________________
>     Talk-transit mailing list
>     Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20190323/8d509cbc/attachment.html>