[Talk-transit] bus=yes opinion

[Mateusz Konieczny]

And I in turn consider public_transport tag family as adding nothing useful and
encouraging pointless duplication.

I would be happy to consider them as deprecated, but I am not sure is there a clear support
for that.

And I am certain that most of people would be against deprecating highway=bus_stop

Introducing public_transport scheme was a mistake, but introducing it while keeping
simpler one made no sense at all.

Jul 11, 2020, 10:31 by robin at daeneke.at:

> If the highway=bus_stop tag is also being used, it seems quite redundant to me. But I would be all for killing that old tag and only using the new p_t scheme (which sadly was proposed as additional instead of the new norm) and then it would be useful to have the mode=yes tags, as long as the platform is not assigned to at least one route relation. As soon as one eg. bus route contains the platform, the bus=yes is implied and hence redundant. But that would just be my view. 
>
> (The p_t scheme would need a new, forced version that fixes such required double taggings, but that is a topic for another time.)
>
> KR
> RobinD (emergency99)
>
>> Am 11.07.2020 um 07:35 schrieb Agustin Rissoli <aguztinqui at gmail.com>:
>>
>> 
>> What are your opinion of adding bus=yes along with public_transport=platform + highway=bus_stop?
>> I can't find info on the wiki that supports this practice, I know it was introduced by iD, but I don't see where this has been discussed.
>> My question arises because there is only one user who is adding bus=yes (and train=yes on railway platforms, etc.), to all stops in Argentina, probably correcting the errors that iD marks.
>>
>>
>> Saludos, Agustín.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-transit mailing list
>> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-transit mailing list
> Talk-transit at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-transit/attachments/20200711/f8536feb/attachment.htm>