[Talk-us-massachusetts] Fwd: landuse=conservation

[Greg Troxel]

Jim Snyder-Grant <jim.snyder.grant at gmail.com> writes:

> The two of us working on Acton conservation land mapping a lot these days
> are willing to make the change to boundary=protected_area in Acton.
> We are thinking  protect_class=5 seems to fit best for our conservation
> lands, but this is open for consideration.

If you are doing manual mapping, I think you can just go ahead and do
whatever you think best and not worry about it too much, but it's of
course nice to ask for opinions as you just did.  You don't have the
duty of care that an automated edit has, and Acton doesn't have so many
areas that changing the tags is really hard (an hour or so?).

I wonder if you have any areas where leisure=nature_reserve does not
apply (Arboretum, arguably) and another leisure= tag also does not apply
(?).   I would be curious to see what happens rendering-wise to an area
with boundary=protected_area and no leisure=.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 162 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20170116/341a1065/attachment.sig>