[Talk-us-massachusetts] Let's delete MA imported massgis: attributes
Nicholas Davidowicz
nicholasdavidowicz at gmail.com
Wed May 3 19:38:20 UTC 2017
imo would be much better to fix this in software and sort them towards the
bottom.
another related issue I've noticed is that paved roads will be mis-marked
as unpaved if they are are a certain State of disrepair. should be possible
to tackle this with an automated too.
Nick
On May 3, 2017 2:35 PM, "Alan & Ruth Bragg" <alan.ruth.bragg at gmail.com>
wrote:
> When editing objects with JOSM it's discouraging to have to scroll through
> a lot massgis attributes to find the "real" tags.
>
>
> Here's an example, it takes 5 mouse clicks just to scroll through the list
> in JOSM.
>
> access=yes
> area=yes
> created_by=change_tags.py - massgis short_names 0.1
> landuse=conservation
> leisure=nature_reserve
> massgis:ARTICLE97=0
> massgis:ASSESS_ACR=359.00000000
> massgis:ASSESS_LOT=2
> massgis:ASSESS_MAP=45
> massgis:ATT_DATE=2003/10/24
> massgis:BASE_MAP=SKETCH
> massgis:CAL_DATE_R=1/1/2002
> massgis:COMMENTS=INTERIOR LINES FROM BNRC
> massgis:DCAM_ID=0
> massgis:DEED_ACRES=780.00000000
> massgis:EOEAINVOLV=1
> massgis:FEESYM=DFG
> massgis:FEE_OWNER=Department of Fish and Game
> massgis:FY_FUNDING=2002
> massgis:INTSYM=CR
> massgis:LEV_PROT=P
> massgis:OLI_1_ABRV=BNRC
> massgis:OLI_1_INT=CR
> massgis:OLI_1_ORG=Berkshire Natural Resources Council, Inc.
> massgis:OLI_1_TYPE=L
> massgis:OS_DEED_BO=1064
> massgis:OS_DEED_PA=468
> massgis:OS_ID=148-967
> massgis:OWNER_ABRV=DFG
> massgis:OWNER_TYPE=S
> massgis:POLY_ID=967
> massgis:PRIM_PURP=C
> massgis:PROJ_ID1=DCS-CR4
> massgis:PROJ_ID2=DFW0733
> massgis:PUB_ACCESS=Y
> massgis:SITE_NAME=CHALET WMA
> massgis:SOURCE_MAP=DFW733
> massgis:TOWN_ID=148
> name=Chalet Wildlife Management Area
> owner=Department Of Fish And Game
> ownership=state
> protected=perpetuity
> source=MassGIS OpenSpace (http://www.mass.gov/mgis/osp.htm)
> start_date=2002
>
> Taginfo says there are 28,573 things tagged massgis:DCAM_ID
> <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/massgis%3ADCAM_ID>=0, what the
> heck does DCAM_ID mean.
>
> I'd like to suggest we decide which tags have value and delete the rest
> with a bot.
> Maybe some of them could be converted to common OSM tags.
>
> Does anyone agree, or see any reason to keep these tags?
>
> Alan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us-massachusetts mailing list
> Talk-us-massachusetts at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us-massachusetts
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20170503/3b4a6681/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-us-massachusetts
mailing list