[Talk-us-massachusetts] intro and intent
Bill Ricker
bill.n1vux at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 20:27:20 UTC 2022
Ok, can you point me to one of your parks that is NOT green on default
render?
(The parks that I care about most are park colored whenever i look)
Since the primary OSM map is failing to show (your, some) Parks in Parks
Green with the latest Tagging ^consensus^ (*however screwdup that may be*),
there are options besides retagging in a Wiki-style-edit-war or tagging
debates --
- filing bug or PR for default OSM map's render rules to add the current,
offending ^preferred^ park tags to what gets painted park green as parks
should, because yes it is a bug that a Wiki/List preferred park tagging
isn't looking like a park
(if this requires a change in priority between Status and LandCover
during rendering, i guess that's also a bug/PR issue?)
- check if one of the alternate renders in the standard OSM.org does
better, and until above is fixed, recommend THAT view to your
friends/acquaintances/hiking-buddies
(the two Cycle maps are better for trails and hills anyway, as they have
hills!
I'd like a shaded/contours version that doesn't make designated cycle
routes quite so fluorescent, tho.;
OTOH warning that BMX are allowed on one trail but not another may be
useful to hikers )
- and ditto other sites that use OSM data but their own renders,
possibly with additional input (DEM etc)
e.g,
- TopOSM <http://toposm.ahlzen.com/> (wiki
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TopOSM>) (by a local OSM/ham) doesn't
get as deep a zoom level as i'd like so less useful for trails, but
- OpenTopoMap <https://opentopomap.org/#map=17/42.44105/-71.08095> does
get a little deeper (and may get deeper slowly anywhere we zoom ?).
- if you find a slippy map for which you like the park renders, you can
embed *that* slippy map (or a radio-box of just those) in a hobbit.org
(or whatever) webpage (and if maybe even overlay static or dynamic
point/line layers over it !)
e.g. my Radio Field Day Directory
<https://ema.arrl.org/field_day/history/SiteMap.php?option=Act+Maybe>
(
- - which uses PHP only because the EMA Section uses a PHP-based CMS,
and i'm tucked on the backside of the same PHP & MySQL;
- - any other stack would work fine, just need to embed a little JS
in the page template;
- - used to even be able to have static HTML page with either cached
or linked JS libraries and IIRC a link to a local static overlay (text)
data file, but i don't have a working example currently;
- XSS security rules may require hosting the full slippy map JS
stack locally to have local datafile, callback to ./datafile.txt
may now be
forbidden unless one can code permissions headers in the HTTPD
config ?? I
don't have time to reconstruct that *now. But i think it's still
doable?*
)
- ( worst case of course you can put up your own caching tile server
with your own render rules !
which i guess you could restrict to zooming in just the geographic area
you care about unless you got funding from other areas to zoom nation/world
wide.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20220712/75259e41/attachment.htm>
More information about the Talk-us-massachusetts
mailing list