[Talk-us-massachusetts] Landuse Landcover

[Greg Troxel]

Bill Ricker <bill.n1vux at gmail.com> writes:

> There's a cluster of conservation parcels in Dedham
> <https://osmlanduse.org/#15.284891024600025/-71.19876/42.23276/0/> just W
> of 128/95 and 1 that aren't tinted so don't have needed use or cover tags
> even though named tracts with a conservation-y thick boundary. Odd.

Could be the confusion brought on by the boundary=protected_area
juggernaut (that in my experience does not care about the nuances we are
discussing and only focuses on their inscrutable IUCN numeric protect
codes -- but with any luck I'm wrong).

boundary=protected_area is not a landuse tag.  leisure=nature_reserve
and landuse=conservation are.  The render is heavy on
boundary=protected_area becuase those people said it was the new thing
that superceded most everything else -- which was of course wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20220724/2dae5f48/attachment.sig>