[Talk-us-massachusetts] more on Lynn Woods

[Greg Troxel]

"Peter Cooper Jr. via Talk-us-massachusetts"
<talk-us-massachusetts at openstreetmap.org> writes:

> On 7/28/2022 6:57 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> It seems that one could define a mapping to/from layers from OSM tags,
>> and that we can apply the same layer thinking in the OSM
>> representation.   So the layer-type thinking you suggest (and that I
>> agree with) could be implemented in editors.
>>
>> For example:
>>
>>    a layer selection box that if a type is unchecked, then those tags and
>>    objects that would be untagged wihtout them are hidden
>
> Well, iD basically does that. If you're not editing a particular type
> of feature, you can just turn that layer off.

Interesting, thanks.  JOSM might do this too...

When there is object in two classes, does it hide the tags but keep the
object when one is off?

I guess that means it is pretty easy to turn off landuse/boundaries and
edit landcover separately.   I don't see a checkmark for landcover but
maybe they would add that if asked.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us-massachusetts/attachments/20220728/819a2d1c/attachment.sig>