[Talk-us] "highway" tags in the US
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Tue Mar 4 01:55:00 GMT 2008
am12 at bolis.com wrote:
>>> For instance, OR217 and US26 west of Portland are both divided,
>>> multi-lane, limited access highways. Despite not being interstates,
>>> they *ARE* motorways.
>> Hmm, are you sure? maybe they just look like motorways; there are a lot
>> of almost-motorway roads
> Hmm. I'm confused by that. I don't quite understand what it would mean
> for something to just look like a motorway but not be one.
> As far as I can tell, this is an open community project, and terms have to
> be defined by the group to be useful. There is no US Department of
> Transportation statement declaring what kind of road qualifies as a
> "motorway", nor what kind doesn't.
No, but there's a standard for Interstates , which we've taken to be
equivalent to the extent that there's not a need for a separate tag for
UK motorways vs. US Interstates (vs. the Autobahn, etc.)
> So we need to muddle through it
> There are an awful lot of people in the US who recognize what a freeway
> is, regardless of whether they know which bureaucrat signs the check for
> the little bumpy dots between the lanes.
> If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we
> should call it a duck. If it is high-speed multi-lane restricted access
> way with cloverleaf entrances, we should call it a motorway.
What about other types of interchange, e.g. diamond, parclo, etc.?
> of whether it is part of the US Interstate Highway system or not.
Here I agree. My only point of contention is what qualifies as
duck-quacking for our purposes...certainly a highway that meets the
standards without being designated should be tagged as motorway, but as
the link should make clear, it's not all obvious whether a given piece
of the road meets those standards.
> I hope I don't sound confrontational. Are we saying the same thing? I've
> definitely been pondering this myself as to how to classify or judge these
> tags. Good discussion.
I hope the same for myself. I'd really like to get this hashed out,
just so the group can come to some agreement on an unambiguous
definition for a motorway. If that means "limited access, minimum
median width, minimum lane width, minimum vertical/horizontal
clearance", even if this means that some non-standard roads are marked
as motorways, I don't have a problem with it -- as long as there's
agreement on what exactly qualifies.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_standards describes
it, and references standards documents regarding it.
-Alex Mauer "hawke"
More information about the Talk-us