[Talk-us] Tiger 2007 Data

[Matthias Julius]

Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> writes:

> Ian Dees writes:
>  > I don't agree. If the "reviewed" flag was changed to yes without any change
>  > to the imported data, then that means the new TIGER data will be better than
>  > the old ("reviewed") data.
>
> Or worse.  Different != improved.

The reviewed tag is certainly unreliable.  I think the only viable
option is to check whether Dave is still the last editor and therefore
the data has not been changed since the import.  It might be good to
create a special user name for the next automatic import.

The safer option is to automatically update only areas (counties) that
have no manual edits.

Matthias