[Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

[Paul Johnson]

Joseph Jon Booker wrote:

> Also, wouldn't it make sense to have the way a route is displayed as
> the name? For example, network=I,ref=90 would have name="I 90", and
> network=US:IL, ref=58 would have name="IL 58" in the relations.

Not really, no.  Many Interstate routes have official names that have
nothing to do with their status or route number:  See Pacific Highway,
Golden State Freeway, and Baldock Freeway to name a few (and that's just
I-5!)