[Talk-us] Interstate Highways Relations List

[Apollinaris Schoell]

On 12 Apr 2009, at 2:39 , Joseph Jon Booker wrote:
>
> US routes can also become two separate one-ways when becoming
> express ways or trunk ways, while being a regular two-way street the
> rest of the way, so it probably doesn't make sense to have separate
> directions. Perhaps a proposal can be made for having
> role=North|South|East|West for type=route relations?
>

2 relations are easier. adding role to thousands of members is a pain.  
and we need to split relations with API 0.6 anyway

> Also, wouldn't it make sense to have the way a route is displayed as
> the name? For example, network=I,ref=90 would have name="I 90", and
> network=US:IL, ref=58 would have name="IL 58" in the relations.
>
fully agreed, see my other posting

> -- 
> Joseph Booker
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us