[Talk-us] Blame me for JOSM yellowness

[Apollinaris Schoell]

what is the benefit in doing this?
have done it earlier but it is a lot of work and I can't find any  
reason in which use ore application it helps.
If you consider it a sign of completeness or accuracy then this is not  
the way to go.
If you want to see if anyone worked on tiger data it is as simple as  
creating a diff between the original tiger uploads and the current  
planet.
most of the tiger tags should be erased from the database. After  
split,merge,duplicate,move,correct of ways these tags totally broken.  
A bot could be used to erase them on any node,way which was modified  
from the original data.


On 22 Apr 2009, at 7:14 , Russ Nelson wrote:

>
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> Hey there, Paul, I'm glad to see you working on OSM.
>>
>> given how many roads will need reviewing, what's the absolute
>> most efficient way to do so?
>
> In JOSM, select all the roads.  You can do this using several methods:
>   o Search for certain tags.  For example, if you've downloaded a
> small section, and you've reviewed every street name and location, you
> can search for "tiger:reviewed" to catch all the unreviewed ways.
>   o Draw a box around the ways.
>   o Shift-click on way after way after way (Control-click if you
> select too much).
>
> When you've selected everything you want to mark as reviewed, go to
> the Properties box on the right.  Scroll down to tiger:reviewed.
> Click on it, and then click on the trash can on the right.  Poof!
>
> --
> Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson
> russ at cloudmade.com - Twitter: Russ_OSM - http://openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us