[Talk-us] On the subject of TIGER

Theodore Book tbook at libero.it
Fri Apr 24 18:36:26 BST 2009


Since we are speaking of TIGER, the quality of the data seems to vary 
according to county - some are consistently good, others consistently 
poor.  Has anyone looked at the TIGER 2008 data to see if it is better? 
  We have some counties in Georgia that have poor TIGER data in OSM, and 
very few edits, so that the TIGER data could simply be replaced if a 
better source were available.





More information about the Talk-us mailing list