[Talk-us] On the subject of TIGER
Theodore Book
tbook at libero.it
Fri Apr 24 18:36:26 BST 2009
Since we are speaking of TIGER, the quality of the data seems to vary
according to county - some are consistently good, others consistently
poor. Has anyone looked at the TIGER 2008 data to see if it is better?
We have some counties in Georgia that have poor TIGER data in OSM, and
very few edits, so that the TIGER data could simply be replaced if a
better source were available.
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list