[Talk-us] Blame me for JOSM yellowness

[Alex S.]

Russ Nelson wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> I'd also be very happy if JOSM flipped the tag for me when I edit a
>> tiger object.
> 
> Does anybody object to this?  If not, I'll look at inserting special  
> case code which removes tiger:reviewed when the way or any node it  
> solely includes is edited in any way.

I do.  I split a tiger way when I have reviewed a section of it to 
indicate which part I reviewed and which part I haven't.

I can however see the utility of it.  Go ahead and do so, but please 
make it configurable, so those that want to can, but those that don't 
won't have to.