[Talk-us] What, exactly, does the absence of tiger:reviewed=no mean?

[Alan Millar]

I think the quality standards of OSM are subjective, and continuously
evolving (at different rates in different areas), but that doesn't mean we
can't have a reasonable consensus on basic map usability.

> I would expect that removing review:no means something in between
>
> ?"this is now done about as well as I would have expected someone to do
> ?it in the first place"
>
> and
>
> ?"this is now good enough that there's no reason for anyone else to
> ?worry about it"

I think that is actually a fairly good definition.  If someone really,
really needs more specifics, then we should put them on a wiki page,
perhaps

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup

- Alan