[Talk-us] Deletion of unnecessary TIGER node tags will commence this week-end
Frederik Ramm
frederik at remote.org
Thu Aug 6 22:03:22 BST 2009
Hi,
Alan Mintz wrote:
> How about this: If a node has either a name or source_ref tag, only remove
> the tiger:* tags and leave the source tag alone.
Possible, but what about the simpler rule "only act on nodes when source
is either unset or begins with "tiger_import_dch"? (This rule would
exclude a whopping 910 nodes from the 172 million we are considering.)
Another option would be to completely exclude every node that has been
touched after the import (i.e. operate only on those with the pristine
version number 1). That would exclude 4 million nodes from the operation
(and leave 168 million to work on). On the downside, that would probably
be a bit too conservative and leave some superfluous tags in place,
especially where maybe a node has just been moved and the tags not
changed at all. But then again, 4 million is nothing in the grand scheme
of things and we could still think about those later.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list