[Talk-us] Tiger Street Names and Copyright

Apollinaris Schoell aschoell at gmail.com
Sun Feb 1 21:47:04 GMT 2009


Google, Yahoo, .... don't match in a lot of cases.  Google uses Tele  
Atlas data which is obviously derived from same sources as Tiger and  
often completely outdated, in wrong places ....


On 1 Feb 2009, at 13:36 , Ian Dees wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:25 PM, <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> Hilton Long said:
> > Tiger line files are incomplete, especially as regards streets in  
> new
> > developments.  It's possible to draw the streets from Yahoo  
> imagery.  But
> > where to get the names?  Must they come off of street signs?  Is  
> it a
> > violation of copyright to take the names (and ONLY the names) from  
> Google,
> > Yahoo, or Microsoft Maps?
>
> It is absolutely a violation of copyright to take street names from
> copyright maps.
>
> That's incorrect. As discussed previously on one of the other OSM e- 
> mail lists [1], the US Supreme Court ruled long ago [2] that facts  
> are not copyrightable. Street names are not copyrightable because  
> they are facts. Google Maps and similar do not add any creative  
> spark specifically to street names so the street names are not  
> copyrightable. On the other hand, the street centerline data is  
> copyrightable because Google is adding a spark of creativity to the  
> factual data.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/newbies@openstreetmap.org/ 
> msg00502.html
> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_Publications_v._Rural_Telephone_Service
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20090201/a3824312/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list