[Talk-us] Fixing TIGER

[Apollinaris Schoell]

it's just not sufficient to have one tag to tell if data is good or  
not. with yahoo it's easy to check the worst errors but is that enough  
to say it's reviewed?
- is it tagged correct
- is it within an (undefined?) accuracy limit
- ????
there isn't any agreement on other tags either, but thats osm :)





On 7 Jul 2009, at 19:37 , Dave Hansen wrote:

> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 21:53 -0400, Mike N. wrote:
>> Keep in mind for the change detection algorithm, that a few users  
>> do not
>> realize that it is good to remove the tiger:reviewed=no after  
>> verifying or
>> correcting a way.
>
> Heh, that's why I didn't mention tiger:reviewed=no: it's not
> consistently useful.
>
> -- Dave
>