[Talk-us] US Forest Service Wilderness Areas

[Andrew Ayre]

The other question I have is: region 2 wilderness areas consist of 72 
closed ways spread over two states. Should they all be put into a single 
boundary relation, should they each have their own boundary relation, or 
should I not use boundary relations at all?

Andy

Andrew Ayre wrote:
> Hi, I am nearly finished with import of region 3 of the US Forest 
> Service. Thanks to everyone that gave me help, especially Tyler.
> 
> Next I am importing the region 3 wilderness areas. These are part of the 
> US National Forests, but they are areas where there should be no 
> evidence of human activity.
> 
> Is there already a consensus on the tags that should be used for these 
> areas?
> 
> Andy
> 

-- 
Andy
PGP Key ID: 0xDC1B5864