[Talk-us] Proposed automated motorway_link mass edit
Dave Hansen
dave at sr71.net
Fri Jul 17 18:41:41 BST 2009
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:35 -0700, Russ Nelson wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2009, at 9:29 AM, David Lynch wrote:
> > Because I and numerous other mappers have put a hell of a lot of time
> > and effort into getting things right, and I don't want anyone breaking
> > it because an algorithm assumes it isn't right.
>
> Well, I guess that's an argument for only editing data still owned by
> that DaveHansen character.
>
> I appreciate that you have invested significant time and effort into
> getting a particular area into good shape. But it seems to me that
> being able to fix 50 times the area you've already edited, at the cost
> of some damage to your area, is something that you would appreciate is
> a good thing. Or is your concern not the map as a whole, but instead
> the portion of it that you've edited.
This argument really rings true to me. With the TIGER import, there
were certainly areas of higher-quality data that got destroyed. But,
certainly the map benefited overall.
There was also another curious side-effect: the areas that *had*
personal attention given to them were actually the ones that it was
easiest to make decisions about overwriting things. They already had a
loving and caring human to fix them up if anything went wrong.
-- Dave
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list