[Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Addressing Question

Apollinaris Schoell aschoell at gmail.com
Thu Nov 12 04:17:20 GMT 2009


On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Anthony <osm at inbox.org> wrote:

>
> On the other hand, putting the information directly on the way would
> be problematic for many reasons.  Ranges might span multiple ways, and
> right/left has to be reversed whenever the way is reversed being the
> most troublesome.
>
> this is enough reason to stay away from such a scheme. if it's too
difficult no one will use it or they will break the data.


> It probably has to be a relation.  Include a start node, an end node,
> and a list of one or more ways (which are connected to form one
> logical way).
>
>  the ways have to be split at the start/end node. the relation members have
to be ordered. too many beginners and medium experienced mappers have
problems to understand such a scheme. how is that easier than the Karlsruhe
scheme?



> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20091111/5e1b15a6/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list