[Talk-us] question: relations & divided highways
Paul Johnson
baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Sep 7 00:03:39 BST 2009
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 09:28 -0500, Ian Dees wrote:
> I've been using one relation for both directions, but wasn't there a
> concern about the maximum number of items in a relation a while ago? I
> don't remember what we decided after that discussion.
Non-trivial freeways (ie, freeways longer or more complex than Oregon's
I-405, which is practically a freeway connector) should have one
relation each direction. If the route goes undivided anywhere, I tend
to go with one relation for both directions.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20090906/c7195ea3/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list