[Talk-us] Unpaved streets

Chris Hunter chunter952 at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 01:39:15 BST 2009


On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Alex Mauer <hawke at hawkesnest.net> wrote:

> On 09/09/2009 12:05 PM, Chris Hunter wrote:
> > yes, yes, yes - this is the most sane summary of the road/track debate
> I've
> > seen in quite a while.  Of course, it also reopens the track/path
> argument,
> > but I'll leave that to others to battle out.
>
> How is there even an argument there?  track is for cars and always has
> been, while path is for not-cars and always has been.
>
> There's an ongoing thread on the newbies list about tracks and paths not
rendering in the cyclemap layer.  It's basically a rehash of the "code for
accuracy, not for the renderer".  The start of the thread is at
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/newbies/2009-September/003522.html


>  -Alex Mauer “hawke”
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20090910/ca08e6e4/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list