[Talk-us] Directional Prefix/Postfix Proposal
balrogg at gmail.com
Sun Aug 1 03:34:35 BST 2010
On 1 August 2010 03:54, Kevin Atkinson <kevin at atkinson.dhs.org> wrote:
> 1) An exception to the abbreviation rule for directional indicators
> with the fully expanded name going into "alt_name"
First I'd like to oppose making exceptions from the global rules in
local rules. The global rules are vague enough that there's always
some space to express all that is needed by further specifying the
(Note that in the end there's no official local or global rules..
question you asked at the end of your mail. So in the end many people
will try to learn the scheme by looking at the map data around them,
or by doing what seems logical. This does not mean that there
shouldn't be any rules, but it does mean that they need to be rather
> I propose an exception to the abbreviation rule be made for directional
> indicators. 'North, 'South', 'East', and 'West' when a directional
> indicator (and not part of the street name) shall be abbreviated 'N.', 'S.',
> 'E.', and 'W.' (with a period, will explain why below), and Northeast,
> Southeast, Northwest, Southwest shall be abbreviated as 'NW', 'SW', 'SE',
> and 'NW' (without any periods). The fully expanded name may be included in
You can make up a new tag, like full_name, or alt_spelling, there's no
limitation on this. I feel that alt_name should probably be left for
actual alternative names.
> 3) Spelling out the prefix can lead to ambiguous situations where it is
> unclear if the prefix is part of the street name (vid the kid gave several
> examples in his web page)
But you later propose the "included" thing which removes this ambiguity.
More information about the Talk-us