[Talk-us] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - Directional Prefix & Suffix Indication
Nathan Edgars II
neroute2 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 24 02:12:04 BST 2010
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Alan Mintz
<Alan_Mintz+OSM at earthlink.net> wrote:
> At 2010-08-22 19:28, you wrote:
>> I wouldn't put too much stock in the fact that directionals on street
>> signs are often in smaller fonts. The people who are responsible for
>> such signs are trying to make them useful while holding down cost (and
>> not having street signs that are exceptionally long).
> I disagree. There is no reason to think that they are not also trying to
> show that the directional is part of the block number, not the name, and in
> exactly the way that one would expect - by making it smaller and positioned
> with the block number, and not the name. Logic says this is the more likely
> intent of the sign makers. When someone uses a different font in a document,
> they are usually trying to tell the user that the information is of a
> different type than that shown in other fonts.
Perhaps a better example is Orlando. I linked a photo in the previous
The directions are clearly marked as part of the addresses here.
More information about the Talk-us