[Talk-us] High Priority Corridors?

Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 12 21:57:49 GMT 2010

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net>
>> wrote:
>> > i concur, the NHS tagging should be done as route relations.
>> They don't work as relations, since they're not always routes that can
>> be followed from start to end.
> Then create a new relation that contains the ways that are part of the
> system?

Wouldn't this be using a relation as a category?

I would be willing to change the numbered high-priority corridors to
relations, but they won't be strictly routes (then again neither are
some state highways that have gaps or spurs).

More information about the Talk-us mailing list