[Talk-us] "refs" describing routes instead of ways
baloo at ursamundi.org
Thu Dec 23 23:00:33 GMT 2010
On 12/22/2010 10:20 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 12/22/10 10:32 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> On 12/22/2010 08:45 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>>> it may be that we want to
>>> evolve it, but just changing it without a plan and some level of
>>> and declaring that it's the renderers that are wrong, is a recipe mostly
>>> for ticking people off.
>> This is why I brought it up.
> ok, fine. i think, myself, that we should leave the ref tag on the ways
> alone and discuss some alternative tagging for this style of reference
Other than legacy issues that would need to be resolved, is there a
compelling reason to describe the route on something other than the
route? I see this as a problem with consistency, but not one that is
insurmountable; notice how bicycle routes were once tagged on member
ways but have since been moved to relations, and no other entities get
described by tagging a completely different entity.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Talk-us