[Talk-us] Why addr:state rather than is_in:state?

Alan Mintz Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.Net
Fri Dec 31 22:44:53 GMT 2010

At 2010-12-31 14:22, Toby Murray wrote:
>... Also, is there much value in
>adding these tags on multi-state relations? For example:
>addr:state=TN;KY;OH;IN on this relation:

[ US-27 ]

Not IMO for US-* routes. No more than tagging everything other feature with 
the state in which it lies, that is. In that absurd case, is_in:state would 
be more appropriate, IMO.

Alan Mintz <Alan_Mintz+OSM at Earthlink.net>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list