[Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying InterstateRelations

Matthias Julius lists at julius-net.net
Mon Feb 8 22:07:59 GMT 2010

"Mike N." <niceman at att.net> writes:

>> Second, separating out the highway system requires the data consuming
>> application to know how to piece things back together.  Otherwise, a
>> shield on a map for example with just a "25" in it is pretty limited in
>> use.
>   After / if a generalized shield solution is in place, a 25 placed on an 
> 'Interstate' shield is quite descriptive.

But it required every application that is to deal with US data to know
about it.

> It avoids the need for the renderer or consumer to parse out the
> number.

Which is quite trivial to do.

>> Third, I consider a reference containing just the number to be
>> incomplete.  IMHO, the ref tag should contain the complete designation
>> of a piece of highway.  This also makes it easier to search for this.
>   To search, just search for both the network and route tags.  It's just as 
> though the information was placed in separate database columns.

Which makes it much more complicated if the application used for
searching does not support the schema.


More information about the Talk-us mailing list