[Talk-us] GNIS - All Feature_Classes Imported?

[Mike Thompson]

Alan,

Thanks for your reply.

Does anyone have an issue if I work on adding these for Colorado?  The
GNIS defines a "Pillar" (I misspoke when I said Pinnacle) as

=======
Pillar 	Vertical, standing, often spire-shaped, natural rock formation
(chimney, monument, pinnacle, pohaku, rock tower).
=======

tagstat (http://tagstat.hypercube.telascience.org/tagdetails.php?tag=natural)
shows that "natural:rock" is being used.  Would that be appropriate in
this case?

Mike

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:13 PM, am12 <am12 at bolis.com> wrote:
>
>> It seems that not all GNIS Feature_Classes were imported
>
> Correct.
>
> I worked on part of it.  I don't remember the details, but there were
> feature classes that overlapped with other data sources (like NHD) so did
> not appear to be useful to import.  There were also many that did not map
> cleanly into OSM tags.  I don't recall the pinnacles in particular, but
> there certainly was *not* one big GNIS import.
>
> And as mentioned, it could have been deleted also.
>
> - Alan
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
>