[Talk-us] Does only_straight_on imply no_u_turn?

Alex S. maps at swavely.com
Sat Jan 9 03:15:00 GMT 2010


Randy wrote:
> I would not count on only_straight_on as being interpreted as no_u_turn; 
> nor would I assume no_left_turn includes no_u_turn as a default. 90% or 
> more of the time the implication would be there, but there are some cases 
> where a U-turn may be permitted at a traffic light, against the designated 
> traffic flow. Much better, and more flexible, to overtly include all 
> restrictions.

In Washington State, one can U-Turn anywhere they can do so without 
blocking traffic unless specifically restricted by signage or local 
ordinance.





More information about the Talk-us mailing list