[Talk-us] Percentage of data imported vs mapped

[McGuire, Matthew]

Thanks All,

I guess it's not an easy question to answer.

Maybe it would break down like this:

OSM Edits
-Import
--Tiger
--Other
-Bot
-User
--New geography
--First edit to import
--Other edit

It would be fun to see the relative state to state activity and, of course, compare it to international activity.


Matt


-----Original Message-----
From: Apollinaris Schoell [mailto:aschoell at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:23 PM
To: Dave Hansen
Cc: Richard Weait; McGuire, Matthew; talk-us at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Percentage of data imported vs mapped

> In Oregon, 48% of the objects have been most recently modified by
> non-TIGER sources.  Calculated this way:
>
> grep -o 'user="[a-zA-Z0-9]*"' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vi tiger | awk '{sum += $1} END { print sum;}'
> grep -o 'user="[a-zA-Z0-9]*"' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | awk '{sum += $1} END { print sum;}'
>
> It's higher than I expected, personally.  Not too shabby.
>

and how much of it are bots? the real user edits are probably much lower

> -- Dave
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-us mailing list
> Talk-us at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us