[Talk-us] PA State Parks

[Adam Schreiber]

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Sven Lafebre <s.lafebre at psu.edu> wrote:
> Most of these parks are tagged as physical areas. For example, state
> game lands are natural=wood and leisure=nature_reserve. Unfortunately,
> these tags don't always correspond to the actual land use. Moreover,
> they are really administrative entities, not physical ones. So I would
> like to change them to something similar to the scheme used for parks
> e.g. in the Bay Area:
>
> boundary=national_park
> admin_level=4
> park:type=state_game_land
>
> The underlying physical land use can then be mapped orthogonally to
> this.

I'm not sure if the tagging is correct, but that's probably the right
sort of approach moving forward as people might want to micro-map the
land cover.

Cheers,

Adam