[Talk-us] Trail Route Relationships
Alex Mauer
hawke at hawkesnest.net
Mon May 10 18:07:55 BST 2010
On 05/07/2010 03:04 PM, Val Kartchner wrote:
> Which levels should be assigned as the "name" for each trail segment?
> The rest will be used in the "name" for the route relationships? Once I
> get an answer, I'll change the trails for consistency.
Basically, follow the directions[1] for working with route
relationships. Create a relation for each trail section as you have,
give it the name of the section. Then create a super-relation
containing all the trail sections, and give it the name of the trail
network. Assign each of them an appropriate route type[2]. Add any
extra stuff, e.g. foot=*, bicycle=*, horse=*.
I’ll admit to doing a bit of tagging for the renderer where I’ve had to
map similar trails, by using the ref=* tag to hold the section name, and
name=* to hold the global trail name.
1. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Mapping_practice
2.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#List_of_route_types_in_use
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 554 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20100510/4423243e/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list