[Talk-us] Proposal: delete census-designated place polygons

[Nathan Edgars II]

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Mike N. <niceman at att.net> wrote:
> I don't know of any benefits to keeping them - they meet the definition of
> something that belongs in its original database - there's no value added in
> bringing them into the map - they don't need to interconnect or interact
> with other map elements, and checking or resurveying them on the ground is
> difficult to impossible.

Technically they do connect to "real" administrative boundaries, but
as said boundaries are fixed (the TIGER data is horrible in places) we
can't know how the CDP boundaries are supposed to be changed.