[Talk-us] Highway Tagging Consensus to Improve OSM (and address some of 41 latitude's concerns)

Ian Dees ian.dees at gmail.com
Fri Oct 15 22:57:46 BST 2010


On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Ian Dees <ian.dees at gmail.com> wrote:
> > and for county road HHH:
> >   type=route
> >   route=road
> >   network=US:WI:CO
> >   ref=HHH
>
> Why "CO"? Doesn't Wisconsin use CTH (county trunk highway)?
>

I made that one up (CO for County). Yes, CTH probably makes more sense but
isn't that pretty specific? Do all states use that verbiage?

Maybe "network"'s value should simply be "us_route", "state_route", or
"county_route" with several is_in=* tags to make it easier to render.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20101015/0b171f5a/attachment.html>


More information about the Talk-us mailing list