[Talk-us] State Route relations (was: HighwayTaggingConsensustoImprove OSM (and address some of 41latitude's concerns))
niceman at att.net
Sat Oct 16 19:16:48 BST 2010
> Adding a single-carriageway to the relation twice, once for each role,
> would solve this problem instantly, as would using two separate
> relations. Neither requires much (if any) code changes to support it.
> But in any case, I'm much more in favor of consistency, even if the
> format we choose isn't the one I would prefer.
That's probably the best argument for separate relations per direction;
it works directly with existing tools. That fit probably is worth any
minor issues with keeping track of multiple relations.
More information about the Talk-us