[Talk-us] Highway Tagging Consensus to Improve OSM (and address some of 41 latitude's concerns)

Paul Johnson baloo at ursamundi.org
Sat Oct 16 23:02:33 BST 2010

On 10/15/2010 05:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ian Dees <ian.dees-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> I don't think we should be storing any prefix as part of the network=* or
>> ref=* tags (thus my suggestion for network=us_route/state_route/county_route
>> or similar). For example the "I-x" denotation shouldn't show up anywhere in
>> our tags. If it's an interstate it should be tagged as such (I suggest
>> network=interstate but I think there's a precedent on the wiki) and the
>> renderer can add the "I-" if it wants to.
> This only works in relations because of overlaps. And relations are
> too easy to break (split a way and upload the new ways only).

They're not easy to break if you're using a proper editor and being careful.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20101016/2125a897/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Talk-us mailing list