[Talk-us] Do City Labels look funny to you?
baloo at ursamundi.org
Wed Oct 20 01:11:24 BST 2010
On 10/19/2010 05:00 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Mike N.
> <niceman at att.net
> <mailto:niceman at att.net>> wrote:
> Tom Hughes, OSM contributor and infrastructure guru has written an
> interesting summary of why some part of OSM can look strange.
> Sounds like a good project for a bot to correct to the OSM norm?
> On the contrary: I say all these critiques indicate the need for a
> US-specific rendering of the map that does things in a more United
> States-ey way.
> - Non-rectangular highway shields
This benefits more than just the US. Mexico and Canada also have
> - Colors that are closer to what most other US road maps
I do appreciate the depth of detail of the OS-style coloring Mapnik
provides at-a-glance; even the USGS maps leave a lot to be desired if
you're not driving a car. Ideally, OSM would be substantially less
> - More granular city name placement based closer on population than on
> the place tag
Ideally, we should be moving away from city centroids for tagging and go
with outlines anyway.
> - Support for route relations
I doubt this is a US-specific problem; doesn't the UK have this going ad
nauseum with the Sustrans NCN already?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Talk-us