[Talk-us] Highway Tagging Consensus to Improve OSM (and address some of 41 latitude's concerns)

Phil! Gold phil_g at pobox.com
Sat Oct 23 16:44:17 BST 2010

* Nathan Edgars II <neroute2 at gmail.com> [2010-10-15 14:03 -0400]:
> Route relations may be a problem with county roads in some places.
> [In Florida] you'll sometimes have a county road that's only signed at
> one end, and the other end of what used to be signed may be a number of
> towns and turns away. The county no longer considers it to be a numbered
> county road in any meaningful way, and the state doesn't have
> jurisdiction to decide where a county road goes. So the route has an
> indeterminate end.
> I've been tagging these by choosing an arbitrary sensical point to
> stop tagging the ref at.

In my opinion, that's semantically identical to having a route relation
for the route, picking a point to split the way, and only adding one of
the new ways to the relation.  I don't see how this is an argument against
route relations.

...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/
PGP: 026A27F2  print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248  9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2
--- --
Mae'n brydgell ac mae'r brochgim stwd
        Yn gimblo a gyrian yn y mhello:
Pob cólomrws yn féddabwd,
        A'r hoch oma'n chwibruo.
                       -- Lewis Carroll, "Jabberwocky"
---- --- --

More information about the Talk-us mailing list