[Talk-us] Highway Tagging Consensus to Improve OSM (and address some of 41 latitude's concerns)
phil_g at pobox.com
Mon Oct 25 20:44:03 BST 2010
* Alex Mauer <hawke at hawkesnest.net> [2010-10-25 12:44 -0500]:
> So dealing with having a prefix in the ref is pretty much guaranteed
> to be a requirement no matter what.
Not strictly. Having a prefix in the rendering is important, but that can
be synthesized from the other tags in every suggestion that's been made.
I'll go a little further, though, and state that if community consensus
(assuming we get one, sigh) is for one of the schemes that's different
than what we have now, I will submit a ticket for updating the rendering,
and I will include a patch to make it happen. (I can't guarantee a
timeline on acceptance, but I will do the stylesheet hacking necessary.)
...computer contrarian of the first order... / http://aperiodic.net/phil/
PGP: 026A27F2 print: D200 5BDB FC4B B24A 9248 9F7A 4322 2D22 026A 27F2
Email signatures can contain viruses! Spread the word!
---- --- --
More information about the Talk-us