[Talk-us] Highway Tagging Consensus to Improve OSM (and address some of 41 latitude's concerns)

Nathan Edgars II neroute2 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 25 23:17:47 BST 2010

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Alex Mauer <hawke at hawkesnest.net> wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 04:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>>> I totally agree.  My point is just that some people and some states
>>> (Michigan, Kansas) feel that the prefix itself is an important part of
>>> the
>>> reference number: “The M in the state highway numbers is an integral part
>>> of
>>> the designation…Michigan highways are properly referred to using the M
>>> and
>>> never as ‘Route 28’ or ‘Highway 28’”.
>> It's part of the name when you're talking about the route, just like
>> one would say "I-95" or "US 1". It's not part of the designation as
>> shown in shields, either on the ground or on maps.
> Oh, really?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M-28.svg

The "M" is part of the shield, like "INTERSTATE" is part of the
Interstate shield, and "US" used to be part of the U.S. Highway

More information about the Talk-us mailing list