[Talk-us] Route Tagging Consensus

Toby Murray toby.murray at gmail.com
Tue Oct 26 07:51:15 BST 2010


On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 08:43 AM, Zeke Farwell wrote:
>
>> For Michigan route 12:
>> ref=12
>> network=state
>> state=michigan
>>
>> For Bennington County route 16 in Vermont:
>> ref=16
>> network=county
>> state=vermont
>> county=bennington
>
> I like it, though it should be pointed out that this is more difficult
> unless we're talking about route relations.

I kind of like this system as well. It is clear and easy to
understand. The only problem (as pointed out before) is that it breaks
the network tag compared to the rest of the world. Can we use it
anyway? :)

Toby



More information about the Talk-us mailing list