[Talk-us] Route Tagging Consensus
osm at inbox.org
Sat Oct 30 14:02:06 BST 2010
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Richard Welty <rwelty at averillpark.net> wrote:
> On 10/30/10 8:32 AM, Anthony wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Richard Weait<richard at weait.com> wrote:
>>> Rather than jumping to an answer "The tags
>>> shall be this!" can we look at what our ideal goals would be?
>> Sure, in this order: Avoid ambiguity. Avoid subjectivity. Avoid
>> redundancy. Add detail. Try to maintain as much backward
>> compatibility as possible.
> make the lives of authors of data consumers (renderers, routers,
> etc) easier rather than harder
Yes, that would be a good summary of my 5 goals.
More information about the Talk-us