[Talk-us] County road network relations

[Kristian M Zoerhoff]

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:56:51AM -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 4/13/11 10:54 AM, Mike N wrote:
> >On 4/13/2011 10:44 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>>>  network="US:CA:Orange"
> >>>>  + ref="CR S18"
> >>I'd drop the CR prefix since that's more of a network identifier than a
> >>reference number.
> >
> >
> >  Most Interstates, US Highways and most state highways include
> >the network identifier.   Why should this be dropped for the
> >county roads?

> ways vs. relations. we need the identifier on ways because of the
> data consumers
> that expect to render directly. for relations, we should in theory
> be only including
> the actual reference number.

Isn't that just tagging for the renderer?

-- 

Kristian Zoerhoff
kristian.zoerhoff at gmail.com