[Talk-us] Boundary Relation and Tagging

Mike Thompson miketho16 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 5 00:24:51 BST 2011


I am local and 253754 is certainly close.  I will have to do some
additional research to determine exactly what it should be, but I know
that 112524 is incorrect.

On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mike Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Here is another, somewhat related, question.  Fort Collins CO is
>> represented by two separate relations: 112524 and 253754,
>
> Seems to me that the first one is totally broken and useless (compare
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/112524 and
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/253754) but i'll defer to the
> locals ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail frederik at remote.org  ##  N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>



More information about the Talk-us mailing list