[Talk-us] Boundary Relation and Tagging
Mike Thompson
miketho16 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 5 00:24:51 BST 2011
I am local and 253754 is certainly close. I will have to do some
additional research to determine exactly what it should be, but I know
that 112524 is incorrect.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Frederik Ramm <frederik at remote.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mike Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Here is another, somewhat related, question. Fort Collins CO is
>> represented by two separate relations: 112524 and 253754,
>
> Seems to me that the first one is totally broken and useless (compare
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/112524 and
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/253754) but i'll defer to the
> locals ;)
>
> Bye
> Frederik
>
> --
> Frederik Ramm ## eMail frederik at remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
>
More information about the Talk-us
mailing list